Re: [PATCH] dm-thinp: report correct optimal I/O size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:47:33AM +0100, Joe Thornber wrote:
> I'm tempted to just say min(16M, tc->block_size << SECTOR_SHIFT).  Does
> this sound reasonable to you?

If you have a good reason for the limit go for it.  But please add a
comment explaining why the limit is there, so people running into it
later on won't be completely puzzled.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux