Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:16:16 +0100
Cc: htejun@xxxxxxxxx, Matt <jackdachef@xxxxxxxxx>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dm-devel <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, htd <htd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx>, Milan Broz <mbroz@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <AANLkTik=ivDrBEzg1wQAp5AFzNtRRq1=NpvnowggU=_0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <AANLkTin3A_ySn_sZQPqZMn-NORnteQZwTVVSiW_=r3sO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101207142145.GA27861@think> <AANLkTikJt-ZOmzj68Jw92rjGHzu0EP-uCVD+eNSO=vGd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101207182243.GB21112@xxxxxxxxxx> <20101207193514.GA2921@xxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTim8UTkfxXV0AkEfjNq3tcmnrXdh6BQ1ibY5iYPy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101209180111.GF2921@xxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTimAUB5L5Ptm4Fv=sQUmL9_P5azPRCKQnmU89xs8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101209201359.GG2921@xxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTik=ivDrBEzg1wQAp5AFzNtRRq1=NpvnowggU=_0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: device-mapper development <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

> 512MB.
> 
> 'free' reports 75MB, 419MB free.
> 
> I originally noticed the problem on really real hardware (thinkpad
> T61p), however.

If you can easily reproduce it could you try a git bisect?

-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
  - From: Chris Mason

References:
- Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
  - From: Matt
- Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
  - From: Chris Mason
- Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
  - From: Jon Nelson
- Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
  - From: Mike Snitzer
- Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
  - From: Ted Ts'o
- Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
  - From: Jon Nelson
- Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
  - From: Ted Ts'o
- Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
  - From: Jon Nelson
- Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
  - From: Ted Ts'o
- Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
  - From: Jon Nelson

Prev by Date: Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
Next by Date: Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
Previous by thread: Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
Next by thread: Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [DM Crypt] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite Discussion] [KDE Users] [Fedora Docs]