On 11/03/2010 12:51 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: >> >>> 2) scale up the number of workqueue threads used for a single dm-crypt >>> device so that a device can realize per-cpu concurrency (to address >>> Andi's scalability concerns: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/244031/) > > They are already addressed in my patchkit and the patches seem to be used > by more and more users. It's just you guys who are behind. No, sorry, they are not addressed. Did you read my mail with tests? http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/20/215 Async crypto is not solved at all by your patch. Milan -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel