On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 05:34:50PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote: > On 10/10/2010 03:08 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > > I did it intentionally not split up because a split up is unlikely > > to be bisectable. I think there is no need for any splitups. > > Shrug. The main encryption thread and ESSIV per-cpu are two separate > things from my point of view. Is not obvious to me. > > Anyway, the ball is on DM maintainer's playground now. Well I was told already for 2.6.35 it was ready to merge (and also I already have an active user base, people are using it because it's solving a wide spread problem) I am frankly somewhat surprised things should be suddenly completely open now again and such contortions as you did to the patch should be needed. -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
