[PATCH 15/41] block: make sure FSEQ_DATA request has the same rq_disk as the original

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



rq->rq_disk and bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk may differ if a request has
passed through remapping drivers.  FSEQ_DATA request incorrectly
followed bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk ending up being issued w/ mismatching
rq_disk.  Make it follow orig_rq->rq_disk.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 block/blk-flush.c |    7 +++++++
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-flush.c b/block/blk-flush.c
index cb4c844..7d1fc98 100644
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -111,6 +111,13 @@ static struct request *queue_next_fseq(struct request_queue *q)
 		break;
 	case QUEUE_FSEQ_DATA:
 		init_request_from_bio(rq, orig_rq->bio);
+		/*
+		 * orig_rq->rq_disk may be different from
+		 * bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk if orig_rq got here through
+		 * remapping drivers.  Make sure rq->rq_disk points
+		 * to the same one as orig_rq.
+		 */
+		rq->rq_disk = orig_rq->rq_disk;
 		rq->cmd_flags &= ~(REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA);
 		rq->cmd_flags |= orig_rq->cmd_flags & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA);
 		rq->end_io = flush_data_end_io;
-- 
1.7.1

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux