Remove now unused REQ_HARDBARRIER support. virtio_blk already
supports REQ_FLUSH and the usefulness of REQ_FUA for virtio_blk is
questionable at this point, so there's nothing else to do to support
new REQ_FLUSH/FUA interface.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 17 ++++-------------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index d10b635..1260628 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -128,9 +128,6 @@ static bool do_req(struct request_queue *q, struct virtio_blk *vblk,
}
}
- if (vbr->req->cmd_flags & REQ_HARDBARRIER)
- vbr->out_hdr.type |= VIRTIO_BLK_T_BARRIER;
-
sg_set_buf(&vblk->sg[out++], &vbr->out_hdr, sizeof(vbr->out_hdr));
/*
@@ -388,13 +385,7 @@ static int __devinit virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
vblk->disk->driverfs_dev = &vdev->dev;
index++;
- /*
- * If the FLUSH feature is supported we do have support for
- * flushing a volatile write cache on the host. Use that to
- * implement write barrier support; otherwise, we must assume
- * that the host does not perform any kind of volatile write
- * caching.
- */
+ /* configure queue flush support */
if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH))
blk_queue_flush(q, REQ_FLUSH);
@@ -515,9 +506,9 @@ static const struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
};
static unsigned int features[] = {
- VIRTIO_BLK_F_BARRIER, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX,
- VIRTIO_BLK_F_GEOMETRY, VIRTIO_BLK_F_RO, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE,
- VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI, VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH, VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY
+ VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_GEOMETRY,
+ VIRTIO_BLK_F_RO, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI,
+ VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH, VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY
};
/*
--
1.7.1
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
