On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:23:55PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > Yeap, agreed. I couldn't really understand why the the sequence > needed to be atomic for ide in the first place so just left it alone. > Do you understand why it tried to be atomic? I think initial drafs of the barrier specification talked about atomic sequences. Except for that I can't think of any reason. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
