Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2 block#for-linus] bio, fs: update READA and SWRITE to match the corresponding BIO_RW_* bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Jeff Moyer, on 08/05/2010 10:45 PM wrote:
>> Tejun Heo<tj@xxxxxxxxxx>  writes:
>>
>>> Commit a82afdf (block: use the same failfast bits for bio and request)
>>> moved BIO_RW_* bits around such that they match up with REQ_* bits.
>>> Unfortunately, fs.h hard coded READ, WRITE, READA and SWRITE as 0, 1,
>>> 2 and 3, and expected them to match with BIO_RW_* bits.  READ/WRITE
>>> didn't change but BIO_RW_AHEAD was moved to bit 4 instead of bit 1,
>>> breaking READA and SWRITE.
>>>
>>> This patch updates READA and SWRITE such that they match the BIO_RW_*
>>> bits again.  A follow up patch will update the definitions to directly
>>> use BIO_RW_* bits so that this kind of breakage won't happen again.
>>>
>>> Stable: The offending commit a82afdf was released with v2.6.32, so
>>> this patch should be applied to all kernels since then but it must
>>> _NOT_ be applied to kernels earlier than that.
>>
>> Would someone be so kind as to remind me how this problem manifests
>> itself?  I know I read this recently, but my memory and googling skills
>> are both failing me.  :(
>
> See http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/28/315 and link inside.

Thanks a ton!

-Jeff

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux