On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 05:07:49PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > OK, thanks for clarifying. This confirms that the general approach I > took in this patch is correct. It remains to be seen if Jens is > agreeable with blk_clear_request_payload. > > I know Christoph thought my introduction and use of > blk_clear_request_payload was reasonable. Christoph, please feel free > to add your Ack to this patch if you approve. Yes, I think that's the right way to do it. Btw, guys - what happened to the idea of trimming useless context in mail replies? This thread got almost unreadable because of the quoting at this point. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
