Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: allow initialization of previously allocated request_queue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 11 2010, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, May 11 2010 at  2:55am -0400,
> Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, May 10 2010, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > blk_init_queue() allocates the request_queue structure and then
> > > initializes it as needed (request_fn, elevator, etc).
> > > 
> > > Split initialization out to blk_init_allocated_queue_node.
> > > Introduce blk_init_allocated_queue wrapper function to model existing
> > > blk_init_queue and blk_init_queue_node interfaces.
> > > 
> > > Export elv_register_queue to allow a newly added elevator to be
> > > registered with sysfs.  Export elv_unregister_queue for symmetry.
> > > 
> > > These changes allow DM to initialize a device's request_queue with more
> > > precision.  In particular, DM no longer unconditionally initializes a
> > > full request_queue (elevator et al).  It only does so for a
> > > request-based DM device.
> > 
> > Looks good, I'll apply this. I don't think the exports need to be _GPL
> > in this case, generally I've only done that with the exports for hooking
> > in a new IO scheduler.
> 
> OK, thanks for picking this up.  Do you want me to send v2 that drops
> the _GPL or will you make those changes?

I just hand-edited that part. I can add the dm bit as well, when it has
been reviewed and acked.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux