On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 03:43:44PM -0700, Moger, Babu wrote:
> - DMERR("Cannot failover device because scsi_dh_%s was not "
> - "loaded.", m->hw_handler_name);
> + DMERR("Could not failover device. Error %d.", errors);
Would it be meaningful still to include m->hw_handler_name in that message?
Alasdair
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
