> Note: I'm not specifically arguing for keeping the 80-column rule, the > project I work on uses 100 columns, and that's quite workable, but I > haven't had any problem working with 80 columns as a limit either. I > do however think that just removing the limit without replacing it > with something better is a bad idea. > > -Kevin Granade But think what happens when someone views that 100-char code on 80-char terminal (or for example 94-char, that I used for some times too) --- every second line will be wasted with just 20 characters on the left. On the other hand, if you have unlimited line length, it will look better on 80-char terminal. Mikulas -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
