On Thursday 17 December 2009 04:37:41 pm Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > Examples? :) > > They're typically things like this: > > - ret = sscanf (buf, "0x%lx - 0x%lx", &start_addr, &end_addr); > + ret = sscanf(buf, "0x%lx - 0x%lx", &start_addr, > + &end_addr); > > ie a line-break that is just annoying and makes the code harder to read > rather than easier. Well, it could have been done in the other way: - ret = sscanf (buf, "0x%lx - 0x%lx", &start_addr, &end_addr); + ret = sscanf(buf, "0x%lx - 0x%lx", + &start_addr, &end_addr); Just an example that the limit itself is usually not a problem but its literal interpretation is.. I don't feel strongly about it the either way so how's about just adding the switch and than changing the default (Alasdair?) on top of it? -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel