Hannes Reinecke wrote:
/*
+ * Evaluate scsi return code
+ */
+static int eval_scsi_error(int result, char *sense, int sense_len)
+{
+ struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
+ int r = DM_ENDIO_REQUEUE;
+
+ if (host_byte(result) != DID_OK)
For values like DID_NO_CONNECT or DID_TRANSPORT FAILFAST, I think it
makes sense to fail the path. Not in this patch, but a new one, would we
want to modify dm-mpath so that we do not fail the path for errors like
DID_ABORT or DID_SOFT_ERROR, DID_RESET or DID_ERROR?
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
