On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:38:48PM -0800, Mike Anderson wrote: > Yes this patch set should not be needed post the fix to the message ioctl. > The reduction was aimed at future callers using dm_get_md prior to > DMF_FREEING being set as the dm_table_destroy holders wait would not > proceed until current message operations had completed, but the reduction > of this case is not that important with the other message ioctl changes in > place. I've left it in my tree for now (with the suggested simplifications - private to dm.h), to enforce the situation that the dm core will not forward messages to table targets after they begin to be deleted. Alasdair -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
