On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 04:25:26PM +0900, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote: > On 11/13/2009 11:19 PM +0900, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > > Would DMF_BLOCK_IO_FOR_SUSPEND work instead? > If we'd like to keep the ability to use message during flushing I/Os, > we should use another flag for this purpose and set it after > dm_wait_for_completion(). We should rename the flag as it's original meaning has changed:-) FOR_SUSPEND_OR_FLUSH Alasdair -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
