Re: Do not overload dispatch queue (Was: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 22:17 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 04 2009, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 20:38 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 04 2009, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 19:39 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > So I'll commit a change that doesn't do the delay at all, basically it
> > > > > just offset the current code by one slice.
> > > > 
> > > > Ok, when it hits block-for-linus, I'll take it out for a spin.
> > > 
> > > It's committed:
> > > 
> > > http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commit;h=e00c54c36ac2024c3a8a37432e2e2698ff849594
> > 
> > Looks like a keeper to me :)
> 
> Wonderful, so I take it this passes your 'gut feel' test too? :-)

Heh, yeah.  Box feels good, disk sounds happy.. none of those little
indescribables that make you suddenly go alert.

	-Mike

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux