On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Doesn't look too bad, all things considered. Apart from "stock" cfq, > it's consistent. And being consistent is a Good Thing. Performance wise, > it's losing out to "stock" but looks pretty competetive otherwise. I agree. And I think the numbers for the kconsole test are pretty conclusive. That's a big improvement (on top of the already very impressive improvement). > So far that looks like a winner. The dictator wanted good latency, he's > getting good latency. I'll continue working on this on monday, while I'm > waiting for delivery of the Trabant. Trabant? As in the car? Why would you _ever_ wait for delivery? The sane option would be to try to hide, or run away? Linus -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
