* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > It's really not that simple, if we go and do easy latency bits, then > > throughput drops 30% or more. > > Well, if we're talking 500-950% improvement vs 30% deprovement, I > think it's pretty clear, though. Even the server people do care about > latencies. > > Often they care quite a bit, in fact. The other thing is that latency is basically a given property in any system - as an app writer you have to live with it, there's not much you can do to improve it. Bandwidth on the other hand is a lot more engineerable, as it tends to be about batching things and you can batch in user-space too. Batching is often easier to do than getting good latencies. Then there's also the fact that the range of apps that care about bandwidth is a lot smaller than the range of apps which care about latencies. The default should help more apps - i.e. latencies. Ingo -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
