On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 05:27:55PM +0200, Corrado Zoccolo wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 12:55:25PM +0200, Corrado Zoccolo wrote: > > > > Actually I am not touching this code. Looking at the V10, I have not > > changed anything here in idling code. > > I based my analisys on the original patch: > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0907.1/01793.html > Oh.., you are talking about fairness for seeky process patch. I thought you are talking about current IO controller patches. Actually they both have this notion of "fairness=1" parameter but do different things in patches, hence the confusion. Thanks Vivek > Mike, can you confirm which version of the fairness patch did you use > in your tests? > > Corrado > > > Thanks > > Vivek > > -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
