On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:50:06AM -0500, Jon Brassow wrote: > As long as we are on the topic of mirror logs (and this is unrelated to > your patch), I'd like to complain about the current behavior of log > allocation vs the log policy. I don't think it should take > 'alloc_anywhere' for a log to be placed on the same disk as one of the > mirror legs... that should be 'alloc_normal'. It was assumed that performance would be better this way, but I have never seen any tests to prove or disprove that. Maybe someone could run some? One way we could handle this is by creating a new policy between NORMAL and ANYWHERE that does this, then renaming the old NORMAL to something else and the new policy to NORMAL. Alasdair -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
