Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH] dm-mirror: fix data corruption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mikulas,

On 08/31/09 17:39, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> I uploaded patches for this bug at: 
> http://people.redhat.com/mpatocka/patches/kernel/mirror-race/
> 
> But note! They were never tried. When I wanted to try them, I found out 
> that dmeventd is totally nonworking in upstream code (it doesn't pass 
> "handle_errors" argument and has some crashes and signal errors), so I 
> didn't test them with dmeventd. Dmeventd must be fixed first, then we can 
> work on this bug.

Thank you for posting the patch set. I roughly looked at your patch and
have several comments.

 - The flag, "handle_errors," won't be passed to dm-raid1 by dmeventd. lvm
   commands (e.g. vgchange) or dmsetup pass "handle_errors" when new mirror
   mapping is created.

 - As I mentioned before, bios which are sent to out-of-sync regions also
   need to be blocked because bios to out-of-sync regions are processed by
   generic_make_request() and would return the "success" to upper layer
   without dm-raid1 notices it. This might cause data corruption.
   https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-July/msg00118.html

 - The modification of write_callback() looks a little confusing to me.
   Do all bios need to be blocked? When all legs returns error, the bio
   should be returned with -EIO to upper layer without being blocked as
   original code using uptodate flag.

I appreciate your comments.

Thanks,
Taka

-- 
Takahiro Yasui
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux