Re: Regarding dm-ioband tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-09-08 12:01:19]:

> I think there are some advantages to dm-ioband. That's why I post
> dm-ioband to the mailing list.
> 
> - dm-ioband supports not only proportional weight policy but also rate
>   limiting policy. Besides, new policies can be added to dm-ioband if
>   a user wants to control bandwidth by his or her own policy.
> - The dm-ioband driver can be replaced without stopping the system by
>   using device-mapper's facility. It's easy to maintain.
> - dm-ioband can use without cgroup. (I remember Vivek said it's not an
>   advantage.)

But don't you need page_cgroup for IO tracking?

-- 
	Balbir

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux