Hi Vivek,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Ryo,
>
> I decided to play a bit more with dm-ioband and started doing some
> testing. I am doing a simple two dd threads doing reads and don't seem
> to be gettting the fairness. So thought will ask you what's the issue
> here. Is there an issue with my testing procedure.
Thank you for testing dm-ioband. dm-ioband is designed to start
throttling bandwidth when multiple IO requests are issued to devices
simultaneously, IOW, to start throttling when IO load exceeds a
certain level.
Here is my test script that runs multiple dd threads on each
directory. Each directory stores 20 files of 2GB.
#!/bin/sh
tmout=60
for nr_threads in 1 4 8 12 16 20; do
sync; echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
for i in $(seq $nr_threads); do
dd if=/mnt1/ioband1.${i}.0 of=/dev/null &
dd if=/mnt2/ioband2.${i}.0 of=/dev/null &
done
iostat -k 1 $tmout > ${nr_threads}.log
killall -ws TERM dd
done
exit 0
Here is the result. The average throughputs of each device are
according to the proportion of the weight settings when the number of
thread is over four.
Average thoughput in 60 seconds [KB/s]
ioband1 ioband2
threads weight 200 weight 100 total
1 26642 (54.9%) 21925 (45.1%) 48568
4 33974 (67.7%) 16181 (32.3%) 50156
8 31952 (66.2%) 16297 (33.8%) 48249
12 32062 (67.8%) 15236 (32.2%) 47299
16 31780 (67.7%) 15165 (32.3%) 46946
20 29955 (66.3%) 15239 (33.7%) 45195
Please try to run the above script on your envirionment and I would be
glad if you let me know the result.
Thanks,
Ryo Tsuruta
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
