Vivek Goyal wrote:
...
> +static void place_entity(struct io_service_tree *st, struct io_entity *entity,
> + int add_front)
> +{
> + u64 vdisktime = st->min_vdisktime;
> + struct rb_node *parent;
> + struct io_entity *entry;
> + int nr_active = st->nr_active - 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * Currently put entity at the end of last entity. This probably will
> + * require adjustments as we move along
> + */
> + if (io_entity_class_idle(entity)) {
> + vdisktime = elv_delta_fair(ELV_IDLE_DELAY, entity);
> + parent = rb_last(&st->active);
> + if (parent) {
> + entry = rb_entry(parent, struct io_entity, rb_node);
> + vdisktime += entry->vdisktime;
> + }
> + } else if (!add_front && nr_active) {
> + parent = rb_last(&st->active);
> + if (parent) {
> + entry = rb_entry(parent, struct io_entity, rb_node);
> + vdisktime = entry->vdisktime;
> + }
> + } else
> + vdisktime = st->min_vdisktime;
Hi Vivek,
Should we set vdisktime a little small than st->min_vdisktime to ensure putting
this entity at the left-most position when add_front is set?
> +
> + entity->vdisktime = max_vdisktime(st->min_vdisktime, vdisktime);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void io_entity_update_prio(struct io_entity *entity)
> +{
> + if (unlikely(entity->ioprio_changed)) {
> + /*
> + * Re-initialize the service tree as ioprio class of the
> + * entity might have changed.
> + */
> + init_io_entity_service_tree(entity, parent_entity(entity));
> + entity->ioprio_changed = 0;
> + }
> +}
> +
--
Regards
Gui Jianfeng
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
