On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:14:05 +0900 (JST)
Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The body of blkio-cgroup.
> + * blkio_cgroup_set_owner() - set the owner ID of a page.
> + * @page: the page we want to tag
> + * @mm: the mm_struct of a page owner
> + *
> + * Make a given page have the blkio-cgroup ID of the owner of this page.
> + */
> +void blkio_cgroup_set_owner(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm)
> + * blkio_cgroup_reset_owner() - reset the owner ID of a page
> + * @page: the page we want to tag
> + * @mm: the mm_struct of a page owner
> + *
> + * Change the owner of a given page if necessary.
> + */
> +void blkio_cgroup_reset_owner(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> + blkio_cgroup_set_owner(page, mm);
> +}
> +void blkio_cgroup_reset_owner_pagedirty(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> + if (!page_is_file_cache(page))
> + return;
> + if (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC)
> + return;
> +
> + blkio_cgroup_reset_owner(page, mm);
> +}
> +
Hmm, why pass "mm" not "thread" ? Do we need to take care of mm->ownder ?
Why "current" is bad ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
