Vivek Goyal wrote:
...
> +static struct io_group *
> +io_group_chain_alloc(struct request_queue *q, void *key, struct cgroup *cgroup)
> +{
> + struct io_cgroup *iocg;
> + struct io_group *iog, *leaf = NULL, *prev = NULL;
> + gfp_t flags = GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ZERO;
> +
> + for (; cgroup != NULL; cgroup = cgroup->parent) {
> + iocg = cgroup_to_io_cgroup(cgroup);
> +
> + iog = io_cgroup_lookup_group(iocg, key);
> + if (iog != NULL) {
> + /*
> + * All the cgroups in the path from there to the
> + * root must have a io_group for efqd, so we don't
> + * need any more allocations.
> + */
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + iog = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*iog), flags, q->node);
> + if (!iog)
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + iog->iocg_id = css_id(&iocg->css);
Hi Vivek,
IMHO, The io_cgroup id is nothing more than keeping track the corresponding iocg.
So why not just store iocg pointer in io_group and just get rid of this complexity.
I'd like to post a patch to do this change, what's your opinion?
--
Regards
Gui Jianfeng
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
