On Wed, June 24, 2009 5:09 pm, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 01:43:35PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote: >> Since this test was added, barriers have not worked on md, and (I >> think) dm and similar devices that don't use __make_request and so >> don't bother to set next_ordered. > > In dm, we added this: > > + blk_queue_ordered(md->queue, QUEUE_ORDERED_DRAIN, NULL); > I obviously didn't grep for the right thing. This will obviously work, but I can't help thinking it is in the wrong place. I don't even have a queue in md/raid1, so making a statement about how it is ordered just doesn't make sense. Jens? NeilBrown -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel