On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:44:58PM -0700, Divyesh Shah wrote: > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Vivek Goyal<vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > void elv_deactivate_ioq(struct elv_fq_data *efqd, struct io_queue *ioq, > > + int requeue) > > +{ > > + if (ioq == efqd->active_queue) > > + elv_reset_active_ioq(efqd); > > + > > + bfq_deactivate_entity(&ioq->entity, requeue); > > +} > > The check for ioq == efqd->active_queue and the call to > elv_reset_active_ioq() seem to be unnecessary. This gets called from > elv_del_ioq_busy() which has 2 callers which: > - either explicitly check for ioq != efqd->active_queue > - or call elv_reset_active_ioq() right before invoking this function > > This was needed earlier as the io_ioq_move() function didn't fall in > one of the 2 categories above. This has been done away with the ref > counting patch, AFAICT. True. Looks like we don't need above reset_active_ioq() call in deactivate_ioq(). I will get rid of it in next posting. Thanks. Vivek -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel