Re: getting dm-ioband merged to upstream

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Alasdair,

Could you give me your opinions on the followings please?

Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Alasdair,
> 
> About five months have passed since dm-ioband was included in your
> 'editing' tree, but the state of the patch is still 'Under Review.'
> 
> I think that dm-ioband is stable and working fine, and "Tested-by"
> tag was put on the patch by a person other than the developers.
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-March/msg00143.html
> 
> So could you consider getting dm-ioband merged to upstream?
> I think that dm-ioband is qualified to get merged to upstream.
> Please let me know your honest opinions.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ryo Tsuruta
> 
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux