Vivek Goyal wrote:
...
> +ssize_t elv_fairness_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *name,
> + size_t count)
> +{
> + struct elv_fq_data *efqd;
> + unsigned int data;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + char *p = (char *)name;
> +
> + data = simple_strtoul(p, &p, 10);
> +
> + if (data < 0)
> + data = 0;
> + else if (data > INT_MAX)
> + data = INT_MAX;
Hi Vivek,
data might overflow on 64 bit systems. In addition, since "fairness" is nothing
more than a switch, just let it be.
Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/elevator-fq.c | 10 +++++-----
block/elevator-fq.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.c b/block/elevator-fq.c
index 655162b..42d4279 100644
--- a/block/elevator-fq.c
+++ b/block/elevator-fq.c
@@ -2605,7 +2605,7 @@ static inline int is_root_group_ioq(struct request_queue *q,
ssize_t elv_fairness_show(struct request_queue *q, char *name)
{
struct elv_fq_data *efqd;
- unsigned int data;
+ unsigned long data;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
@@ -2619,17 +2619,17 @@ ssize_t elv_fairness_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *name,
size_t count)
{
struct elv_fq_data *efqd;
- unsigned int data;
+ unsigned long data;
unsigned long flags;
char *p = (char *)name;
data = simple_strtoul(p, &p, 10);
- if (data < 0)
+ if (!data)
data = 0;
- else if (data > INT_MAX)
- data = INT_MAX;
+ else
+ data = 1;
spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
efqd = &q->elevator->efqd;
diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.h b/block/elevator-fq.h
index b2bb11a..4fe843a 100644
--- a/block/elevator-fq.h
+++ b/block/elevator-fq.h
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ struct elv_fq_data {
* throughput and focus more on providing fairness for sync
* queues.
*/
- int fairness;
+ unsigned long fairness;
};
extern int elv_slice_idle;
--
1.5.4.rc3
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
