On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 13:24 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 5 May 2009 15:58:27 -0400 > Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > Here is the V2 of the IO controller patches generated on top of 2.6.30-rc4. > > ... > > Currently primarily two other IO controller proposals are out there. > > > > dm-ioband > > --------- > > This patch set is from Ryo Tsuruta from valinux. > > ... > > IO-throttling > > ------------- > > This patch set is from Andrea Righi provides max bandwidth controller. > > I'm thinking we need to lock you guys in a room and come back in 15 minutes. > > Seriously, how are we to resolve this? We could lock me in a room and > cmoe back in 15 days, but there's no reason to believe that I'd emerge > with the best answer. > > I tend to think that a cgroup-based controller is the way to go. > Anything else will need to be wired up to cgroups _anyway_, and that > might end up messy. FWIW I subscribe to the io-scheduler faith as opposed to the device-mapper cult ;-) Also, I don't think a simple throttle will be very useful, a more mature solution should cater to more use cases. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
