Hi Nauman, > > The real question is, once you create a version of dm-ioband that > > co-operates with CFQ scheduler, how that solution would compare with > > the patch set Vivek has posted? In my opinion, we need to converge to > > one solution as soon as possible, so that we can work on it together > > to refine and test it. > > I think I can do some help for your work. but I want to continue the > development of dm-ioband, because dm-ioband actually works well and > I think it has some advantages against other IO controllers. > - It can use without cgroup. > - It can control bandwidth on a per partition basis. > - The driver module can be replaced without stopping the system. In addition, dm-ioband can run on the RHEL5. Thanks, Ryo Tsuruta -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
