Re: Patchwork and patch flow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Patchwork and patch flow
From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:48:31 +0000
In-reply-to: <A5C05773-7C8F-4D59-B742-DBDC85799DFB@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: device-mapper development <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered in England and Wales, number 03798903. Registered Office: Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE.
References: <20090107025952.GH3512@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090205.204508.71105166.ryov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <A5C05773-7C8F-4D59-B742-DBDC85799DFB@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: device-mapper development <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

The key thing I'm looking for in Tested-By is independence from
the original developers.

Alasdair
-- 
agk@xxxxxxxxxx

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Patchwork and patch flow
  - From: Ryo Tsuruta

References:
- Patchwork and patch flow
  - From: Alasdair G Kergon
- Re: Patchwork and patch flow
  - From: Ryo Tsuruta
- Re: Patchwork and patch flow
  - From: Jonathan Brassow

Prev by Date: Re: shared snapshots
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.28.2 & dm-snapshot or kcopyd Oops
Previous by thread: Re: Patchwork and patch flow
Next by thread: Re: Patchwork and patch flow
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [DM Crypt] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite Discussion] [KDE Users] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux