Hi Alasdair, Sorry for confusing you. On 01/29/2009 11:03 PM +0900, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 03:59:10PM +0900, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote: >> This patch-set can be applied on top of 2.6.29-rc2. > > It's not clear: are you reordering the dependencies now? > > Previously there were three sets of patches taken in this order: > 1 change to request-based > 2 add queue length ps > 3 add service time ps > i.e. 2 and 3 depend on 1 > > Are you now changing that so that 2 and 3 could go upstream before 1? I had sent those three sets in the order above since 1 enhances 2 and 3. But 2 and 3 don't functionally depend on 1 (although 1 and 3 have a few cosmetic dependencies), so we can reorder that as we want. 2 and 3 are simpler patches than 1, and I found some problems in 1, so I think reordering might be a good idea if you are OK. As for 3, I still want to get feedback from others as it'll involve discussion about the optimal interface for load balancer. Thanks, Kiyoshi Ueda -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
