On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:19:42PM +0800, crquan@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> From: Cheng Renquan <crquan@xxxxxxxxx> >> 3. totally remove tt_internal; >> The 3rd patch may be controversial, >> But I still think it's worth it: > > Well now that it's down to just one field for linking items I'm inclined to > agree that it's OK. > > Do you (or anyone else) have any interest in creating and testing similar sets > of patches for the other parts of device-mapper that use the same construction? I just came across the device-mapper code and made the patches one month ago, I want to know you (dm-dev)'s attitude toward this type of struct reconstruction. Now I know it and can do more. > > Alasdair > -- > agk@xxxxxxxxxx BTW, why you set Reply-to field to my email address? Maybe an accident of your mail client? -- Cheng Renquan (程任全), Shenzhen, China Groucho Marx - "I was married by a judge. I should have asked for a jury." -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
