Hirokazu Takahashi wrote:
> Hi, Kamezawa-san,
>
> This patch makes the page_cgroup framework be able to be used even if
> the compile option of the cgroup memory controller is off.
> So bio-cgroup can use this framework without the memory controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff -dupr linux-2.6.28-rc2.bc0/include/linux/memcontrol.h linux-2.6.28-rc2/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> --- linux-2.6.28-rc2.bc0/include/linux/memcontrol.h 2008-11-10 18:31:34.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6.28-rc2/include/linux/memcontrol.h 2008-11-11 13:51:42.000000000 +0900
> @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ struct mm_struct;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
>
> +extern void __init_mem_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc);
> +#define mem_cgroup_disabled() mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled
> +
> extern int mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> gfp_t gfp_mask);
> /* for swap handling */
> @@ -81,6 +84,15 @@ extern long mem_cgroup_calc_reclaim(stru
> #else /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR */
> struct mem_cgroup;
>
> +static inline void __init_mem_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline int mem_cgroup_disabled(void)
> +{
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
With CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR not defined, page_cgroup init routines will just
return, is that what bio page_cgroup needs?
--
Balbir
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
