On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 02:27:15PM +0000, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > Indeed - the blocking was a bug for which there's a patch, but that doesn't > deal with how the function should be operating in the first place. > > - If one device is found to be congested, why bother checking the remaining > devices? > > - If the device is suspended, the response should be that it is congested, I'd > have thought. Yes. device congested is a quick an dirty check - if you encounter anything long just return congested if I/O would hit this long delay, too or not congested if you can't really know. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
