Re: [PATCH] Add gfp_mask to bio_integrity_clone()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 31 2008, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Jun'ichi" == Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> Jun'ichi> What do you think about adding gfp_mask parameter to
> Jun'ichi> bio_integrity_clone() like the attached patch?
> 
> Jun'ichi> It also seems natural to inherit gfp_mask from bio_clone
> Jun'ichi> when bio_integrity_clone is called from it.  Since
> Jun'ichi> bio_clone() is the only caller of bio_integrity_clone() in
> Jun'ichi> 2.6.28-rc2 and all in-tree callers of bio_clone() are using
> Jun'ichi> GFP_NOIO, the patch does nothing other than changing the
> Jun'ichi> interface.
> 
> Looks good to me.  I'll update the non-multipath DM bits accordingly.
> 
> Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>

Shall I just include this in the 2.6.29 branch?

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux