Re: [PATCH 6/7] bio-cgroup: Implement the bio-cgroup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ryo Tsuruta wrote:
+static void bio_cgroup_move_task(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
+				struct cgroup *cont,
+				struct cgroup *old_cont,
+				struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	struct mm_struct *mm;
+	struct bio_cgroup *biog, *old_biog;
+
+	if (bio_cgroup_disabled())
+		return;
+
+	mm = get_task_mm(p);
+	if (mm == NULL)
+		return;
+
+	biog = cgroup_bio(cont);
+	old_biog = cgroup_bio(old_cont);
+
+	mmput(mm);
+	return;
+}

Is this function fully implemented?
I tried to put a process into a group by writing to "/cgroup/bio/BGROUP/tasks" but failed.

I think this function is not enough to be used as "attach."

+
+
+struct cgroup_subsys bio_cgroup_subsys = {
+	.name           = "bio",
+	.subsys_id      = bio_cgroup_subsys_id,
+	.create         = bio_cgroup_create,
+	.destroy        = bio_cgroup_destroy,
+	.pre_destroy	= bio_cgroup_pre_destroy,
+	.populate       = bio_cgroup_populate,
+	.attach		= bio_cgroup_move_task,
+	.early_init	= 0,
+};

Without "attach" function, it is difficult to check
the effectiveness of block I/O tracking.

Thanks,
- Takuya Yoshikawa

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux