By "faster" I just meant conceptually, fibre->iSCSI HBA->iSCSI software. I didn't have any intention of actually polling the link somehow. And I will absolutely post it back to the list once we get it written, I already posted the hardware table definition, so that should be working its way in here. --- Jim Lester -----Original Message----- From: dm-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dm-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Konrad Rzeszutek Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 11:43 AM To: device-mapper development Subject: Re: Custom priority callout On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 09:57:22AM -0500, Jim Lester wrote: > Compellent SANs can do a mix of both Fibre connections and iSCSI > connections to the same volume. So some of our customers are looking for > ways to do more complex set ups with iSCSI as a failover situation > behind multiple fibre connections. Nice. I would suggest you develop a library implementation and post it here. This way it could be integrated in all of the Linux distributions over time and your customers won't have to download a package. > > Multibus works fine if they are using like connections, but if not, we > wanted to be able to make sure that the faster connections come up on > top. I am curious how you are going to figure this out on the iSCSI connection? Nop-out latency? -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
