Re: Desynchronizing dm-raid1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:59:33AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
> If you want to negate the meaning of the flag, then you have to write it 
> yourself. I, as non-developer of crypto code, can prove that on given path 
> the input data are read only once --- but I can't prove that on all paths 
> and all possible chaining modes of algorithms the data are read once, 
> because I don't know about all of them.

Huh? Inverting it would give exactly the same result as your current
patch.  If you're not confident with it inverted, then I can't see
how you could be confident about the patch as it is.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux