Re: [PATCH 1/7] scsi_dh: Implement common device table handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Chandra,

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 07:08:13PM -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> Hi Hannes,
> 
> One of my comments (regarding creating a cache of vendor-product-scsi_dh
> trio of already found device type). I will code it and send it.
> 
> Looks good except for the minor comments as noted below.
> 
> On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 16:05 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > +	spin_lock(&list_lock);
> > +	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &scsi_dh_list, list) {
> > +		for(i = 0; tmp->devlist[i].vendor; i++) {
> > +			if (!strncmp(sdev->vendor, tmp->devlist[i].vendor,
> > +				     strlen(tmp->devlist[i].vendor)) &&
> > +			    !strncmp(sdev->model, tmp->devlist[i].model,
> > +				     strlen(tmp->devlist[i].model))) {
> > +				devinfo = tmp;
> > +				break;
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +		if (devinfo)
> > +			break;
> > +	}
> > +	spin_unlock(&list_lock);
> 
> The above block of code can be made into a function (as there are more
> than one usage).
> 
Ok, will do.

> > +
> > +	if (!devinfo)
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	if (action == BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE) {
> > +		err = scsi_dh_handler_attach(sdev, devinfo);
> > +	} else if (action == BUS_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE) {
> > +		if (sdev->scsi_dh_data == NULL)
> > +			goto out;
> 
> Check above is done in scsi_dh_handler_detach. Do you think it is needed
> here ?
> 
No, not really. Just forgot to take it out.

[ .. ]
> > +{
> > +	struct scsi_device_handler *scsi_dh = data;
> > +	struct scsi_device *sdev;
> > +
> > +	if (!scsi_is_sdev_device(dev))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
> > +
> > +	if (!sdev->scsi_dh_data || sdev->scsi_dh_data->scsi_dh != scsi_dh)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	scsi_dh_handler_detach(sdev);
> > 
> > -	scsi_dh->nb.notifier_call(&scsi_dh->nb, BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE, dev);
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> notifier_add above does get_device() and put_device(). We don't need it
> in notifier_remove ?
Oops. Yes, we do.

[ .. ]
> > -				     strlen(clariion_dev_list[i].model))) {
> > -				found = 1;
> > -				break;
> > -			}
> > -		}
> > -		if (!found)
> > -			goto out;
> > -
> > -		scsi_dh_data = kzalloc(sizeof(struct scsi_device_handler *)
> > -				+ sizeof(*h) , GFP_KERNEL);
> > -		if (!scsi_dh_data) {
> > -			sdev_printk(KERN_ERR, sdev, "Attach failed %s.\n",
> > -				    CLARIION_NAME);
> > -			goto out;
> > -		}
> > +	if (sdev->scsi_dh_data)
> > +		return -EBUSY;
> 
> This check has already been done at scsi_dh level. Do we still need it
> here ?
> 
No, we don't.

> > 
> > -		sdev_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdev, "Dettached %s.\n",
> > -			    CLARIION_NAME);
> > +static void clariion_bus_detach(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct scsi_dh_data *scsi_dh_data;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > 
> > -		kfree(scsi_dh_data);
> > -		module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> > -	}
> > +	if (sdev->scsi_dh_data == NULL ||
> > +	    sdev->scsi_dh_data->scsi_dh != &clariion_dh)
> > +		return;
> 
> first check is already done in scsi_dh level.
> 
Fixed.

[ .. ]
> > +static void hp_sw_bus_detach( struct scsi_device *sdev )
> > +{
> > +	struct scsi_dh_data *scsi_dh_data;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > 
> > -		spin_lock_irqsave(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock, flags);
> > -		scsi_dh_data = sdev->scsi_dh_data;
> > -		sdev->scsi_dh_data = NULL;
> > -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock, flags);
> > -		module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> > +	if (sdev->scsi_dh_data == NULL ||
> > +	    sdev->scsi_dh_data->scsi_dh != &hp_sw_dh)
> > +		return;
> first check is already done in scsi_dh level.
> 
Fixed.

Seeing that this will become quite a lengthy process I've put up my scsi_dh
patchset at

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hare/scsi-ml.git
branch: scsi_dh

We should be using this as a starting point and continue this discussion
(and the patches) offline.

Once we've agreed on a status we should be sending the patchset to the
mailinglist. Otherwise we'll be clogging up bandwidth unnecessarily.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@xxxxxxx			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N�g
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N�g)

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux