On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:45:01 -0500 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 01:23 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > blk_get_request initializes rq->cmd (rq_init does) so the users don't > > need to do that. > > > > The purpose of this patch is to remove sizeof(rq->cmd) and &rq->cmd, > > as a preparation for large command support, which changes rq->cmd from > > the static array to a pointer. sizeof(rq->cmd) will not make sense and > > &rq->cmd won't work. > > > > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > block/scsi_ioctl.c | 3 --- > > drivers/block/pktcdvd.c | 2 -- > > drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c | 1 - > > These: > > > drivers/md/dm-emc.c | 2 -- > > drivers/md/dm-mpath-hp-sw.c | 1 - > > drivers/md/dm-mpath-rdac.c | 1 - > > Conflict with this set of patches: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-pending-2.6.git;a=summary > > Which move the dm pieces to being request based. The patch series > hasn't had an ACK yet from Alasdair, but it would be nice if you could > look it over and see if it needs the memsets pulling out. Seems that it needs the memsets pulling out. For example, [PATCH 2/7] scsi_dh: add lsi rdac device handler has: + memset(&rq->cmd, 0, BLK_MAX_CDB); Do you want a patch against scsi-pending? -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
