On Thursday 13 March 2008 14:45:39 Christian Kujau wrote:
> and so does -git8 and -git9...sigh :(
hmm, I can boot any of these -rcX-gitY kernels (but not without some stuck
tasks after about a hour or so...)
but back: I tried lockdep and ran into this: (debug blocker)
pktcdvd: writer pktcdvd0 mapped to sr0
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.25-rc5-git3 #2
---------------------------------------------
scsi_id/8262 is trying to acquire lock:
(&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0
but task is already holding lock:
(&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0
other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by scsi_id/8262:
#0: (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0
#1: (&ctl_mutex#2){--..}, at: [<ffffffff88231af2>] pkt_open+0x26/0x516
[pktcdvd]
stack backtrace:
Pid: 8262, comm: scsi_id Not tainted 2.6.25-rc5-git3 #2
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8024ffe4>] __lock_acquire+0x8c9/0xc72
[<ffffffff804bb23e>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xf9/0x105
[<ffffffff8025079f>] lock_acquire+0x5e/0x77
[<ffffffff802a8e51>] ? do_open+0x7b/0x2c0
[<ffffffff804bb336>] mutex_lock_nested+0xe1/0x270
[<ffffffff802a8e51>] ? do_open+0x7b/0x2c0
[<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0
[<ffffffff802a9116>] __blkdev_get+0x80/0x92
[<ffffffff802a9133>] blkdev_get+0xb/0xd
[<ffffffff88231b6b>] :pktcdvd:pkt_open+0x9f/0x516
[<ffffffff802a8e84>] do_open+0xae/0x2c0
[<ffffffff802a92a4>] ? blkdev_open+0x0/0x6a
[<ffffffff804bcbab>] ? _spin_unlock+0x26/0x2a
[<ffffffff802a92a4>] ? blkdev_open+0x0/0x6a
[<ffffffff802a92db>] blkdev_open+0x37/0x6a
[<ffffffff80282571>] __dentry_open+0xe6/0x1c0
[<ffffffff802826e4>] nameidata_to_filp+0x2e/0x40
[<ffffffff8028272f>] do_filp_open+0x39/0x4b
[<ffffffff804bcbab>] ? _spin_unlock+0x26/0x2a
[<ffffffff8028246f>] ? get_unused_fd_flags+0x10d/0x11c
[<ffffffff80282792>] do_sys_open+0x51/0xd9
[<ffffffff80282843>] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff8020b22b>] system_call_after_swapgs+0x7b/0x80
soooo.....?
scsi_id/8262 is trying to acquire lock:
(&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0
but task is already holding lock:
(&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0
sounds a bit strange? Is this a SMP related problem after all?
(*disabled pktcddvd for now... to see if still locks)
Regards,
Chr...
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
