Re: bio too big device md0 (248 > 240) - lvm on top of raid1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: bio too big device md0 (248 > 240) - lvm on top of raid1
From: Jens Thiele <karme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:26:06 +0200
In-reply-to: <47F9CE9B.80205@xxxxxxxxxx> (Milan Broz's message of "Mon\, 07 Apr 2008 09\:34\:51 +0200")
References: <87ejgv27nb.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46F0DF57.7060207@xxxxxxxxxx> <87tzier9yr.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47F9CE9B.80205@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: device-mapper development <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux)

Milan Broz <mbroz@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> What's probably happening see here  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9401#c3
>
> Thanks,
> Milan

Should I mark my bug report as duplicate of #9401?

Greetings,
Jens

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

References:
- bio too big device md0 (248 > 240) - lvm on top of raid1
  - From: Jens Thiele
- Re: bio too big device md0 (248 > 240) - lvm on top of raid1
  - From: Milan Broz
- Re: bio too big device md0 (248 > 240) - lvm on top of raid1
  - From: Jens Thiele
- Re: bio too big device md0 (248 > 240) - lvm on top of raid1
  - From: Milan Broz

Prev by Date: Re: bio too big device md0 (248 > 240) - lvm on top of raid1
Next by Date: Re: Desynchronizing dm-raid1
Previous by thread: Re: bio too big device md0 (248 > 240) - lvm on top of raid1
Next by thread: Looking for list of supported storage arrays with dm-mp
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [DM Crypt] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite Discussion] [KDE Users] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux