Re: Re: device mapper not reporting no-barrier-support?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 26 2008 schrieb Jens Axboe:
> On Tue, Feb 26 2008, Anders Henke wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26 2008 Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 26 2008, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:20:50PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:26:15 +0100 Anders Henke <anders.henke@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > I'm currently stuck between Kernel LVM and DRBD, as I'm using Kernel
> > > > > > 2.6.24.2 with DRBD 8.2.5 on top of an LVM2 device (LV).
> > > > > > -LVM2/device mapper doesn't support write barriers
> > > > 
> > > > That's right.
> > > > 
> > > > > > -DRBD uses blkdev_issue_flush() to flush its metadata to disk.
> > > > 
> > > > Which won't work if device-mapper is underneath.
> > > > 
> > > > > >  On a no-barrier-device, DRBD should receive EOPNOTSUPP, but
> > > > > >  it really does receive an EIO. Promptly, DRBD gives the
> > > > > >  error message "drbd0: local disk flush failed with status -5".
> > > > > > I've posted a lengty summary of my findings to
> > > > > > http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2008-February/008665.html
> > > > > > ... that DRBD does catch the EOPNOTSUPP for blkdev_issue_flush and
> > > > > > BIO_RW_BARRIER, but the lvm implementation of blkdev_issue_flush in
> > > > > > 2.6.24.2 aparently does return EIO for blkdev_issue_flush.
> > > > > I'd say it's a DM bug.
> > > > 
> > > > The dm code is unchanged, but look at the limited endio handling in
> > > > ll_rw_blk.c:
> > > > 
> > > > static void bio_end_empty_barrier(struct bio *bio, int err)
> > > > {
> > > >         if (err)
> > > >                 clear_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags);
> > > > 
> > > >         complete(bio->bi_private);
> > > > }
> > > > 
> > > > int blkdev_issue_flush(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t *error_sector)
> > > > {
> > > > ...
> > > >         wait_for_completion(&wait);
> > > >         if (error_sector)
> > > >                 *error_sector = bio->bi_sector;
> > > >         ret = 0;
> > > >         if (!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_UPTODATE))
> > > >                 ret = -EIO;
> > > 
> > > You are right, the return value got broken there. Does this make it
> > > return -EOPNOTSUPP properly for you?
> > 
> > 
> > No, it doesn't.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I've applied your patch manually, as 2.6.24.2. doesn't have a "blk-barrier.c":
> > 
> > ---cut
> > --- linux-2.6.24.2/block/ll_rw_blk.c.prepatch   2008-02-11
> > 06:51:11.000000000 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6.24.2/block/ll_rw_blk.c    2008-02-26 20:02:28.514641620
> > +0100
> > @@ -2667,8 +2667,11 @@
> >  
> >  static void bio_end_empty_barrier(struct bio *bio, int err)
> >  {
> > -       if (err)
> > +       if (err) {
> > +               if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> > +                       set_bit(BIO_EOPNOTSUPP, &bio->bi_flags);
> >                 clear_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags);
> > +       }
> >  
> >         complete(bio->bi_private);
> >  }
> > ---cut
> > 
> > ... and the resulting kernel shows exactly the same behaviour than before:
> 
> Not surprising, as you missed half of the patch:

Ouch. Thank you for pointing this out.

I've been spending too much time of the day with things who have a negative 
impact on my concentration and I shouldn't manually patch kernels at
this time of the day.

Yes, it's useless to set a bit, but never check it (like in my version of
your patch).

After adding the second part of your patch, the resulting kernel works as
intended:

[  234.946192] drbd0: conn( WFSyncUUID -> SyncTarget ) 
[  234.956176] drbd0: Began resync as SyncTarget (will sync 19542404 KB
[4885601
 bits set]).
[  234.972567] drbd0: Writing meta data super block now.
[  235.018203] drbd0: local disk flush failed with status -95

DRBD sees the EOPNOTSUPP, logs this message only once and doesn't try
any further barrier requests (as intended).

Just for the records, the 2.6.24.2-ready version of your patch:

---cut
--- linux-2.6.24.2/block/ll_rw_blk.c.prepatch   2008-02-11 06:51:11.000000000 +0
100
+++ linux-2.6.24.2/block/ll_rw_blk.c    2008-02-26 20:58:05.552467940 +0100
@@ -2667,8 +2667,11 @@
 
 static void bio_end_empty_barrier(struct bio *bio, int err)
 {
-       if (err)
+       if (err) {
+               if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
+                       set_bit(BIO_EOPNOTSUPP, &bio->bi_flags);
                clear_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags);
+       }
 
        complete(bio->bi_private);
 }
@@ -2717,7 +2720,9 @@
                *error_sector = bio->bi_sector;
 
        ret = 0;
-       if (!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_UPTODATE))
+       if (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_EOPNOTSUPP))
+               ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+       else if (!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_UPTODATE))
                ret = -EIO;
 
        bio_put(bio);
---cut



Anders
-- 
1&1 Internet AG              better sleep(28800)
Brauerstrasse 48             v://49.721.91374.50
D-76135 Karlsruhe            f://49.721.91374.225

Amtsgericht Montabaur HRB 6484
Vorstand: Henning Ahlert, Ralph Dommermuth, Matthias Ehrlich, Andreas Gauger,
Thomas Gottschlich, Matthias Greve, Robert Hoffmann, Markus Huhn, Achim Weiss
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Michael Scheeren

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux