On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:48:07 +0100 Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > udf_process_sequence() seems to be another victim of gcc inlining. > Hmm, I'll have a look what we can do. noinline... > > udf_add_entry() defines a couple of 256-byte local arrays. > Yes, exactly two of them. One is non-trivial to get rid of - it's > used for encoding of filename before we write it, but one is used during > scanning of the directory whether the entry doesn't already exists (oh, > my!) and we can just rip that off.. kmalloc is quite fast ;) -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
