Re: [PATCH] Implement barrier support for single device DM devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:39:00AM +0000, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> > For example, how safe
> > xfs is if barriers are not supported or turned off?  
> 
> The last time we tried xfs with dm it didn't seem to notice -EOPNOTSUPP
> everywhere it should => recovery may find corruption.

Bug reports, please. What we don't know about, we can't fix.

As of this commit:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=0bfefc46dc028df60120acdb92062169c9328769

XFS should be handling all cases of -EOPNOTSUPP for barrier
I/Os. If you are still having problems, please let us know.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux