On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:53 +0000, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:40:28PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > 1) udev creates device node and sets permissions > > 2) devmapper no-ops since it already exists > > ...because libdevmapper has no notion that something other than itself > could have created it. That's a bug, but provided the proper udev > integration isn't much longer in coming, I shan't bother to fix it. > That's ok ;) no pressure on the patch, I just wanted to make sure that we weren't carrying anything that hadn't at least been shown upstream to see whether you wanted it or not. Obviously we'd prefer the long-term solution, our patch is just a short term one since we're already relying on udev for devmapper work today. Scott -- Scott James Remnant scott@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
